Muddy Boots on the Mind
Is the difference ( as seeing a human being is one being/soul) the psychologist analyses the emotive action or reaction of the human being, whose brain in the biological term is a physiological matter ( a functional anatomical organ), i.e. a solid body of matter activated by electrical impulses of a chemical make-up and the psychiatrists is the study of the breakdown of the latter?
The psychotherapist is then the masseur of the two? In modern terms how does one divide what the role of the psychiatrists does… to that of the psychologist or the psychotherapist.. when without the brain
and the electrical interaction between the matter and chemicals the emotion or ‘feelings’ would not exists. Therefore the psychology of the human being must be interrelated/interconnected with the psychiatric workings of the human being and vice versa. I think, I feel, therefore I am.
Can the two be divided, if so is the division by way of the psychiatric workings,for example throw sticky hot coffee into your lap-top the electrical impulses go hay-wire,therefore its’ behavior changes for what is expected to be the normal response to your physical input tapping on the keys.
The human brain chemical make-up goes hay-wire or: is altered for what ever reason, therefore the behavior changes for what is the expected normal response to the tapping/input of the world outside the emotions/behavior of the psychological side also changes.
What would the answer be? In the term of the measure of human existence: the three mentioned professions are a new science which this question seems yet to be answered?
Discover the answer ” Feel the fear and do it anyway” http://thesydneypsychologist.com/blog/
